System designLoading progress…

DNS and connection setup

Trace a client request and design an HTTP contract with clear failure, retry and pagination behavior.

DNS and connection setup

Before a request can be answered, the client must find an address (DNS, cached according to the record's TTL), open a transport connection (a TCP handshake) and usually negotiate encryption (TLS). Each step can cost round trips. In a simple model with a 40 ms round trip, a cold request costs 4 round trips (160 ms) before any server work; with the DNS answer cached it is 120 ms; on a reused connection it is just 40 ms. That is why connection reuse matters, and why protocol choices change the path.

round-trip time (ms)40
1. DNS lookup 2. TCP handshake 3. TLS 1.3 handshake 4. request + response 4 round trip(s) × 40 ms = 160 ms before the response arrives (simple fixed-RTT model: no payload transfer, queueing or server work) resolving the name only gives an address: it does not show that the service answered
Change the round-trip time, caching and TLS version.

Predict first. Does resolving a hostname prove an application request succeeded?

Chapter context

Clients communicate through name resolution, connections, transport security and application protocols. API semantics determine what a caller can safely infer or repeat when a network interruption hides an operation's outcome.

Chapter reference: math, worked example & code

This section belongs to the whole chapter, so it is the same on every lesson in it and may cover a different lesson's topic. The code for the experiment you just ran is inside the experiment itself.

Math and notation

For k sequential calls with round-trip latency r, the network component alone is approximately k*r under a simple fixed-RTT model. Independent parallel calls have an ideal max-path cost instead. This excludes connection setup, payload transfer, queueing and application computation.

Worked example

Three required sequential remote calls with 40 ms round trips consume about 120 ms of round-trip time before server work. For a separate write example, processing request key op-7 twice should create one logical result if the idempotency contract is implemented atomically. The calculation below is an offline model, not a distributed storage implementation.

Reference code

The following example uses the Python standard library and does not call a remote service.

assert 3*40 == 120
seen={}
def create(key,value):
    if key in seen:
        if seen[key] != value: raise ValueError('key reused with different intent')
        return seen[key]
    seen[key]=value
    return value
assert create('op-7','order-1') == create('op-7','order-1')
assert len(seen) == 1

Python examples are provided for study and local execution; this page does not execute Python.

Common mistakes

A timeout is not proof of rollback. HTTP transport security does not authorize object access. An in-memory deduplication dictionary does not supply durability or atomicity across servers.