LLMsLoading progress…

Dot-product scores

Calculate query-key scores, scaled softmax weights and the weighted value output for one attention head.

How well does a key match the query?

The match between a query and a key is their dot product: large and positive when they point the same way, zero when perpendicular, negative when they point in opposite directions. One query gets one score per allowed key. At this stage the scores are just real numbers, not probabilities.

q[0]1q[1]0
key 1key 2key 3query
keyvectorscore = q · key
1[1, 0]1
2[0, 1]0
3[-1, 0.5]-1

Scores are plain real numbers; a negative one means "pointing away". They become probabilities only after the softmax.

Move the query. The longer the overlap with a key's direction, the higher its score.

Predict first. For q = [1, 0] and keys [1, 0] and [0, 1], what are the scores?

scores = K @ q          # one score per key
S = Q @ K.T             # all queries at once: (n_q, n_k)
Chapter context

Attention computes a data-dependent mixture of value vectors. A query scores candidate keys, a normalization turns scores into weights, and those weights combine values. Keys decide how to look; values supply what is gathered.

Chapter reference: math, worked example & code

This section belongs to the whole chapter, so it is the same on every lesson in it and may cover a different lesson's topic. The code for the experiment you just ran is inside the experiment itself.

Math and notation

Q∈Rnq×dk, K∈Rnk×dk, V∈Rnk×dv.Q\in\mathbb R^{n_q\times d_k},\ K\in\mathbb R^{n_k\times d_k},\ V\in\mathbb R^{n_k\times d_v}. S=QKT/dk+M,A=softmax⁡rows(S),O=AV.S=QK^T/\sqrt{d_k}+M,\quad A=\operatorname{softmax}_{rows}(S),\quad O=AV.

M is zero at allowed positions and conceptually negative infinity at excluded positions. Every query needs a defined policy if all its keys are masked.

Worked example

Use q=[1,0], K=[[1,0],[0,1]], V=[[2,0],[0,2]], and d_k=2. Dot scores [1,0] become [1/sqrt(2),0]. Exponentiate and normalize to approximately [0.669762,0.330238]. The output is [2×0.669762,2×0.330238]≈[1.339523,0.660477]. If only the first key is causally allowed, the output becomes [2,0].

Reference code

The following example uses the Python standard library and does not call a remote service.

from math import sqrt,exp,isclose
q=[1,0]; keys=[[1,0],[0,1]]; values=[[2,0],[0,2]]
scores=[sum(a*b for a,b in zip(q,k))/sqrt(2) for k in keys]
weights=[exp(s-max(scores)) for s in scores]
weights=[w/sum(weights) for w in weights]
out=[sum(weights[i]*values[i][j] for i in range(2)) for j in range(2)]
assert isclose(sum(weights),1)
assert isclose(weights[0],.6697615493266569)
assert isclose(out[0],1.3395230986533138)
assert isclose(out[1],.6604769013466862)

Python examples are provided for study and local execution; this page does not execute Python.

Common mistakes

Attention scores are not weights before normalization. Causal masking happens before softmax. Attention weights alone are not a full causal explanation of a model decision.