Structured output
Send a real request to a model from the provider of your choice, then make the surrounding program trustworthy: constrain the output, validate it, handle streaming and failures, and keep cost bounded.
THE IDEA
Valid JSON is not the same as a usable answer
Asking for JSON gets you text that is shaped like JSON. Three separate things must hold before your program may act on it:
- It parses. No chatty preface, no markdown fence, no single quotes, no cut-off ending.
- It has the shape you need. An object with every required field.
- The values obey your rules. A sentiment from your list, a confidence from 0 to 1.
Each is a different bug with a different fix, and passing one says nothing about the next. Try it. The checker below is the same function the lab uses to grade your output.
Rejected. Valid JSON, but "confidence" = 7 breaks the application rule (0–1).
Rule set: sentiment is one of positive, negative, neutral; confidence is a number from 0 to 1. Passing a stage says nothing about the next one.
Predict first. Does {"sentiment": "positive", "confidence": 7} parse, and is it acceptable?
Valid is not the same as true
Even a perfectly valid object can be wrong: a confident "positive" for a plainly negative review passes every structural check. Validation protects your program from malformed data. It does not prove the content correct. When a value can be checked against a source (an id that must exist, a quote that must appear in the text), check it.
Parse, check fields, check rules, and decide in advance what happens on failure: re-ask once, use a default, or flag for a person.
Call JSON.parse inside a try block that silently carries on with an empty object.
Chapter context
A model API turns input messages into generated output, but the program around it stays responsible for validation, retries and side effects. Every major provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Mistral, Groq, OpenRouter and local OpenAI-compatible servers) exposes the same few ideas under different field names: a model id, a list of messages with optional system instructions, an output-token limit, and a response carrying the text, a reason it stopped, and token usage. The labs in this chapter run against whichever provider you choose with your own key, so you see real behavior rather than a mock.
TRY IT YOURSELF
Part 1. Triage ten recorded outputs
For each output choose the first stage where it fails. The answer key is computed by the same checker as the widget above.
1. {"sentiment": "positive", "confidence": 0.92}
2. Sure! Here is the JSON: {"sentiment": "positive", "confidence": 0.9}
3. ```json {"sentiment": "negative", "confidence": 0.8} ```
4. {"sentiment": "negative", "confidence": 7}
5. {"sentiment": "mixed", "confidence": 0.6}
6. {"sentiment": "neutral"}
7. {'sentiment': 'neutral', 'confidence': 0.5}
8. {"sentiment": "negative", "confidence": "high"}
9. ["negative", 0.8]
10. {"sentiment": "positive", "confidence": 0.9
Part 2. Get valid, in-range JSON from a model
Bring your own key from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Mistral, Groq, OpenRouter, xAI, DeepSeek, or point the Custom option at a local OpenAI-compatible server. The key stays in your browser and goes straight to the provider. With no key, the lab shows a clearly labelled sample response so you can still follow along.
TRY IT YOURSELF
Ask for JSON, then do not trust it
Ask for a JSON object. The verdict reports the stage that fails first: does it parse, and then do the values obey your application rules?
Get output that parses as a JSON object with a sentiment of positive, negative or neutral and a confidence number from 0 to 1.
This request as code
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic() # reads ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
message = client.messages.create(
model="claude-haiku-4-5", # Model
max_tokens=120, # max output tokens
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Review: \"Great screen, but the speaker is awful.\" Return the sentiment and your confidence."}], # User message
)
print(message.content[0].text)
print(message.stop_reason) # end_turn or max_tokens
print(message.usage.input_tokens, message.usage.output_tokens)Update the controls above and this code changes with them. Run it yourself with the key in an environment variable.No key yet, so this shows one sample response for the starting prompt. Add a key above to experiment for real.
Part 3. Code: three stages, three different errors
- Write
validate(text)for a reply that should be{"sentiment": ..., "confidence": ...}. On success return the parsed dict. On failure raiseValueErrorwhose message starts with the stage that failed:syntax:,fields:ordomain:. syntax: the text is not JSON. One markdown fence around the JSON is allowed: strip it first.fields: it parses but is not an object, orsentimentorconfidenceis missing.domain:sentimentis not positive, negative or neutral, orconfidenceis not a number from 0 to 1.- Two Python traps:
Truecounts as a number in Python (it is1), andjson.loadsacceptsNaN, which JSON itself does not allow. Both must fail the domain check. Extra keys are allowed.
All three parts must be solved to finish this lesson.
Stuck, or something not working? You can come back to it any time.
CHECK YOUR UNDERSTANDING
Can {"confidence": 7} parse successfully and still be unacceptable?
Chapter reference: math, worked example & code
This section belongs to the whole chapter, so it is the same on every lesson in it and may cover a different lesson's topic. The code for the experiment you just ran is inside the experiment itself.
Math and notation
Four small rules recur through the chapter.
- Complete or cut off (F8.1): treat the reply as an answer only when the provider's stop reason means a natural stop (
end_turn,stop,STOP), not a limit (max_tokens,length,MAX_TOKENS). - Validation order (F8.2-F8.4): parse, then check fields, then check domain rules. Passing one stage says nothing about the next.
- Backoff (F8.5): wait before retry , where is the base delay and the jitter factor is a random number in (or without jitter). Retry only temporary errors, and stop after a fixed number of retries.
- Cost (F8.6): for prices and per million input and output tokens, and token counts and :
With an output cap , the worst-case output side for calls is . The prices below are invented arithmetic inputs, not a product recommendation; use the provider's current price list for real budgeting.
Worked example
One small helper per idea, all checked offline. A reply stopped with end_turn is usable but one stopped with max_tokens is not. The text {"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 0.7} passes all three validation stages, while a confidence of 7 or a reply with chatty text around the JSON is rejected. A 429 is retried but a 401 is not, and the delays for retries 0, 1 and 2 at a 0.5 s base are 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 seconds. At illustrative prices of 6 per million tokens, a call with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens costs (1000×2 + 500×6)/1,000,000 = $0.005.
Reference code
The following example uses the Python standard library and does not call a remote service. It is the same logic the labs let you try against a real model.
import json
from math import isclose
def usable(stop_reason): # F8.1: a limit means the text may be cut off
return stop_reason in {"end_turn", "stop", "STOP"}
def validate(text): # F8.3: syntax, then fields, then rules
data = json.loads(text) # raises ValueError on bad syntax
if data.get("sentiment") not in {"positive", "negative", "neutral"}:
raise ValueError("bad sentiment")
if not 0 <= data.get("confidence", -1) <= 1:
raise ValueError("confidence out of range")
return data
def should_retry(status, attempt, max_retries=3): # F8.5: temporary errors only, bounded
return status in {429, 529} and attempt < max_retries
def delay(attempt, base=0.5, jitter=1.0): # F8.5: exponential backoff
return base * 2 ** attempt * jitter
def cost(n_in, n_out, p_in=2, p_out=6): # F8.6: illustrative prices
return (n_in * p_in + n_out * p_out) / 1_000_000
assert usable("end_turn") and not usable("max_tokens") and not usable("length")
assert validate('{"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 0.7}')["confidence"] == 0.7
for bad in ['{"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 7}', 'Sure! {"sentiment": "neutral"}']:
try:
validate(bad)
except ValueError:
pass
else:
raise AssertionError("accepted bad output")
assert should_retry(429, 0) and not should_retry(401, 0) and not should_retry(429, 3)
assert [delay(a) for a in range(3)] == [0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
assert isclose(cost(1000, 500), 0.005)
assert isclose(cost(1000, 500) * 10_000, 50)
Python examples are provided for study and local execution; this page does not execute Python.
Common mistakes
JSON output can still be false or out of range. A model call is not required for every rule-based task. Never place a reusable private API credential in a public browser bundle: the labs here use a key you paste yourself, kept in your browser and sent only to the provider, and a shipped product would call the provider from a server instead. Reasoning models can spend part of the output limit on hidden reasoning, so a tiny limit may return empty text.