Foundations: Python, Git and toolsLoading progress…

Structured output

Send a real request to a model from the provider of your choice, then make the surrounding program trustworthy: constrain the output, validate it, handle streaming and failures, and keep cost bounded.

Valid JSON is not the same as a usable answer

Asking for JSON gets you text that is shaped like JSON. Three separate things must hold before your program may act on it:

  1. It parses. No chatty preface, no markdown fence, no single quotes, no cut-off ending.
  2. It has the shape you need. An object with every required field.
  3. The values obey your rules. A sentiment from your list, a confidence from 0 to 1.

Each is a different bug with a different fix, and passing one says nothing about the next. Try it. The checker below is the same function the lab uses to grade your output.

1 parse: ok2 shape and fields: ok3 domain rules: FAILED

Rejected. Valid JSON, but "confidence" = 7 breaks the application rule (0–1).

Rule set: sentiment is one of positive, negative, neutral; confidence is a number from 0 to 1. Passing a stage says nothing about the next one.

Load examples or type your own. Stages after the first failure are not reached.

Predict first. Does {"sentiment": "positive", "confidence": 7} parse, and is it acceptable?

Valid is not the same as true

Even a perfectly valid object can be wrong: a confident "positive" for a plainly negative review passes every structural check. Validation protects your program from malformed data. It does not prove the content correct. When a value can be checked against a source (an id that must exist, a quote that must appear in the text), check it.

Do

Parse, check fields, check rules, and decide in advance what happens on failure: re-ask once, use a default, or flag for a person.

Don't

Call JSON.parse inside a try block that silently carries on with an empty object.

Chapter context

A model API turns input messages into generated output, but the program around it stays responsible for validation, retries and side effects. Every major provider (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Mistral, Groq, OpenRouter and local OpenAI-compatible servers) exposes the same few ideas under different field names: a model id, a list of messages with optional system instructions, an output-token limit, and a response carrying the text, a reason it stopped, and token usage. The labs in this chapter run against whichever provider you choose with your own key, so you see real behavior rather than a mock.

Chapter reference: math, worked example & code

This section belongs to the whole chapter, so it is the same on every lesson in it and may cover a different lesson's topic. The code for the experiment you just ran is inside the experiment itself.

Math and notation

Four small rules recur through the chapter.

  • Complete or cut off (F8.1): treat the reply as an answer only when the provider's stop reason means a natural stop (end_turn, stop, STOP), not a limit (max_tokens, length, MAX_TOKENS).
  • Validation order (F8.2-F8.4): parse, then check fields, then check domain rules. Passing one stage says nothing about the next.
  • Backoff (F8.5): wait dk=b⋅2k⋅jd_k=b\cdot 2^k\cdot j before retry kk, where bb is the base delay and the jitter factor jj is a random number in [0.5,1][0.5,1] (or 11 without jitter). Retry only temporary errors, and stop after a fixed number of retries.
  • Cost (F8.6): for prices pip_i and pop_o per million input and output tokens, and token counts nin_i and non_o:
C=(nipi+nopo)/106.C=(n_i p_i+n_o p_o)/10^6.

With an output cap m≥nom\ge n_o, the worst-case output side for NN calls is N m po/106N\,m\,p_o/10^6. The prices below are invented arithmetic inputs, not a product recommendation; use the provider's current price list for real budgeting.

Worked example

One small helper per idea, all checked offline. A reply stopped with end_turn is usable but one stopped with max_tokens is not. The text {"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 0.7} passes all three validation stages, while a confidence of 7 or a reply with chatty text around the JSON is rejected. A 429 is retried but a 401 is not, and the delays for retries 0, 1 and 2 at a 0.5 s base are 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 seconds. At illustrative prices of 2and2 and 6 per million tokens, a call with 1,000 input and 500 output tokens costs (1000×2 + 500×6)/1,000,000 = $0.005.

Reference code

The following example uses the Python standard library and does not call a remote service. It is the same logic the labs let you try against a real model.

import json
from math import isclose

def usable(stop_reason):                      # F8.1: a limit means the text may be cut off
    return stop_reason in {"end_turn", "stop", "STOP"}

def validate(text):                           # F8.3: syntax, then fields, then rules
    data = json.loads(text)                   # raises ValueError on bad syntax
    if data.get("sentiment") not in {"positive", "negative", "neutral"}:
        raise ValueError("bad sentiment")
    if not 0 <= data.get("confidence", -1) <= 1:
        raise ValueError("confidence out of range")
    return data

def should_retry(status, attempt, max_retries=3):   # F8.5: temporary errors only, bounded
    return status in {429, 529} and attempt < max_retries

def delay(attempt, base=0.5, jitter=1.0):     # F8.5: exponential backoff
    return base * 2 ** attempt * jitter

def cost(n_in, n_out, p_in=2, p_out=6):       # F8.6: illustrative prices
    return (n_in * p_in + n_out * p_out) / 1_000_000

assert usable("end_turn") and not usable("max_tokens") and not usable("length")
assert validate('{"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 0.7}')["confidence"] == 0.7
for bad in ['{"sentiment": "neutral", "confidence": 7}', 'Sure! {"sentiment": "neutral"}']:
    try:
        validate(bad)
    except ValueError:
        pass
    else:
        raise AssertionError("accepted bad output")
assert should_retry(429, 0) and not should_retry(401, 0) and not should_retry(429, 3)
assert [delay(a) for a in range(3)] == [0.5, 1.0, 2.0]
assert isclose(cost(1000, 500), 0.005)
assert isclose(cost(1000, 500) * 10_000, 50)

Python examples are provided for study and local execution; this page does not execute Python.

Common mistakes

JSON output can still be false or out of range. A model call is not required for every rule-based task. Never place a reusable private API credential in a public browser bundle: the labs here use a key you paste yourself, kept in your browser and sent only to the provider, and a shipped product would call the provider from a server instead. Reasoning models can spend part of the output limit on hidden reasoning, so a tiny limit may return empty text.