Agents, MCP and skillsLoading progress…

Least privilege

Identify instruction-injection attempts and design permission, sandbox, approval and evaluation boundaries for an agent.

Least privilege

Give every tool and credential only the access its operation needs. A task that reads documents needs the read scope; a credential that can also write and delete multiplies the damage of any mistake or attack (risk 9 against 1 in the toy weights). Wording in the prompt does not replace this: the model can be told not to delete, but the credential still can. Permissions must be enforced by the application at the point of use.

The task only reads documents. Choose the scopes on its credential.

granted: read, write, delete risk 9 needed: read excess: write, delete narrowed to what is needed: risk 1 (a reduction of 8) a prompt that says "never delete" does not remove the delete scope: the application must enforce permissions
Choose the scopes of the credential.

Predict first. Can a model-side instruction revoke a server credential's actual privileges?

Chapter context

An agent combines untrusted content with tools that can affect real systems. Reliable operation requires boundaries enforced outside model text, alongside clear task authorization and evidence-based evaluation.

Chapter reference: math, worked example & code

This section belongs to the whole chapter, so it is the same on every lesson in it and may cover a different lesson's topic. The code for the experiment you just ran is inside the experiment itself.

Math and notation

For a stated evaluation set:

unsafe pass rate=unsafe cases that passunsafe cases,false block rate=benign cases blockedbenign cases.unsafe\ pass\ rate=\frac{unsafe\ cases\ that\ pass}{unsafe\ cases},\quad false\ block\ rate=\frac{benign\ cases\ blocked}{benign\ cases}.

These empirical rates characterize that set; they are not universal security guarantees. Define denominators and outcome criteria before running the evaluation.

Worked example

An offline evaluation contains 100 unauthorized-action cases, of which 2 pass, and 200 benign cases, of which 5 are blocked. Unsafe pass rate is 2%, and false block rate is 2.5%. Those two numbers measure different failures; averaging them into a single undocumented 'safety score' hides the tradeoff.

Reference code

The following example uses the Python standard library and does not call a remote service.

from math import isclose
unsafe_passes,unsafe_cases=2,100
benign_blocks,benign_cases=5,200
assert isclose(unsafe_passes/unsafe_cases,.02)
assert isclose(benign_blocks/benign_cases,.025)

Python examples are provided for study and local execution; this page does not execute Python.

Common mistakes

A successful prompt-injection defense on one dataset is not a proof for every input. Text instructions cannot substitute for permission enforcement. Audit logs must preserve evidence without exposing credentials.